Every report in chronological order — newest first.
France’s markets watchdog keeps a public list of crypto sites not authorised to solicit there — and several large exchange brands sit on it.
The cold DM about stop-losses and “systemic liquidity” usually ends in a profile link that pays the sender when you trade.
The London Court of International Arbitration is real; cold-call “awards” that ask you to pay tax or unlock fees almost never are.
When a gadget blog ranks “verified traders” that all end in the same Telegram deposit chat, treat the ranking as advertising, not due diligence.
A site that scores Telegram traders while pushing the same three names with near-perfect stars is advertising, not an open investigation desk.
EarnPark is a real-looking CeFi yield front with a PARK token; high staking percentages and self-signed reserve pages still leave you carrying platform, market and legal risk.
The Financial Action Task Force writes standards for countries; it does not invoice you to free a broker balance or recover crypto.
A profitable on-chain profile does not prove the dorm-room legend wrapped around it — especially when the link pays the storyteller.
UCITS is a European fund rulebook, not a helpdesk that emails [email protected] and asks for USDT to open a bank account.
A glamorous “Katya” offering free VIP access and four-figure monthly returns is usually an affiliate poster, not a verified track record.
A counter that ticks up your “earnings” every second is theatre; the real product is the fee they demand before you can leave.
A dating-app “mentor” pushing HedgeCore sUSD staking, then a fake exchange letter demanding more money to unlock funds, is a two-act theft.